Quantum Brainstorm: Difference between revisions
(→FUTURE) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==24 October 2023== |
==24 October 2023== |
||
Chiara - QCELS: |
|||
Early fault tolerant phase estimation algorithm: |
|||
split up the phase estimation into separate Hadamard tests, only one ancilla qubit required for each test |
|||
Heisenberg limit (1/eps rather than 1/eps^2) scaling retained |
|||
T_max is much lower than in conventional QPE => early Fault tolerant |
|||
only requires a squares overlap with the GS of 0.5 |
|||
Paper 1: |
|||
https://journals.aps.org/prxquantum/pdf/10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.020331 |
|||
Paper 2 (about one month later, they realised their analysis wasn't optimal - you only need a squared overlap with the GS of 0.5, rather than 0.71): |
|||
https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.05714 |
|||
Nice talk from IPAM 2023: |
|||
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-MaQtgzksY |
|||
Revision as of 14:18, 25 October 2023
Notes about previous and future quantum brainstorm sessions.
FUTURE
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2310.12726.pdf
Swap test : phase problem (Lila)
24 October 2023
Chiara - QCELS:
Early fault tolerant phase estimation algorithm: split up the phase estimation into separate Hadamard tests, only one ancilla qubit required for each test Heisenberg limit (1/eps rather than 1/eps^2) scaling retained T_max is much lower than in conventional QPE => early Fault tolerant only requires a squares overlap with the GS of 0.5
Paper 1: https://journals.aps.org/prxquantum/pdf/10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.020331
Paper 2 (about one month later, they realised their analysis wasn't optimal - you only need a squared overlap with the GS of 0.5, rather than 0.71): https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.05714
Nice talk from IPAM 2023: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-MaQtgzksY