Difference between revisions of "CamCASP/Bugs/9"

From CUC3
Jump to navigation Jump to search
import>Am592
import>Am592
Line 41: Line 41:
   
 
[[CamCASP/Bugs/9/pyr2-double-Hbonded.clt | Click here for a generic CLUSTER file]]
 
[[CamCASP/Bugs/9/pyr2-double-Hbonded.clt | Click here for a generic CLUSTER file]]
  +
  +
  +
===Sadlej/MC+/AC===
  +
<pre>
  +
mmp12:
  +
ALDA+CHF : -1628.32 -2316.07
  +
ALDAX+CHF: -1546.89 -2324.97
  +
ALDAX : -1460.61 -2065.68
  +
---------------------------------
  +
tati:
  +
Original run: PBE0/AC Integral switch = 0 ifort 11.1
  +
CamCASP: Compiled >= Aug 05 2011
  +
Rev. 22175
  +
ALDAX+CHF: -311.77 -1138.50
  +
---------------------------------
  +
</pre>
  +
The results on Tati are clearly nonsense. Here are some details of that run:
  +
  +
<pre>
  +
DATADIR: CamCASP/tests/bugs/kernel-bugs/bug-1-aldx-chf/pyr2/pyr2-sadlej-mcP-original/
  +
  +
File: $DATADIR/OUT/pot1721-Min13-s0.95-aldax-chf.out
  +
  +
INDUCTION CALCULATION
  +
  +
Parameters same. Skipping DF for pyr_1
  +
OV DF finished for pyr_1
  +
E^{2}_{ind}(UC) = -1634.523269 CM-1
  +
E^{2}_{ind}(UC)(A) = -817.260620 CM-1
  +
E^{2}_{ind}(UC)(B) = -817.262648 CM-1
  +
E^{2}_{ind} = -311.774657 CM-1
  +
E^{2}_{ind}(A) = -194.440126 CM-1
  +
E^{2}_{ind}(B) = -117.334532 CM-1
  +
Density-fitted propagator was used.
  +
Propagator type : cks
  +
---------------------------------
  +
  +
E^{2}_{ind,exch} = 207.525965 CM-1
  +
E^{2}_{ind,exch}(A) = 129.424747 CM-1
  +
E^{2}_{ind,exch}(B) = 78.101219 CM-1
  +
E^{2}_{ind,exch}(UC) = 1087.984745 CM-1
  +
E^{2}_{ind,exch}(UC)(A) = 543.991362 CM-1
  +
E^{2}_{ind,exch}(UC)(B) = 543.993383 CM-1
  +
---------------------------------
  +
  +
---------------------------------
  +
Quad points and XI at each point:
  +
i OMEGA XI
  +
---------------------------------
  +
1 0.006610 -0.903720E-02
  +
2 0.036175 0.100213E+00
  +
3 0.095447 -0.197757E-01
  +
4 0.197644 -0.154010E-01
  +
5 0.370417 -0.103565E-01
  +
6 0.674915 -0.495012E-02
  +
7 1.264899 -0.114417E-02
  +
8 2.619245 -0.200620E-03
  +
9 6.910886 -0.698310E-05
  +
10 37.823762 -0.109340E-07
  +
---------------------------------
  +
E^{2}_{disp} = -1138.500450 CM-1
  +
E^{2}_{disp}(UC) = -3550.241639 CM-1
  +
Density-fitted propagator was used.
  +
Propagator type : cks
  +
---------------------------------
  +
  +
E^{2}_{disp,exch} = 180.486265 CM-1
  +
E^{2}_{disp,exch}(UC) = 562.819148 CM-1
  +
---------------------------------
  +
  +
</pre>

Revision as of 14:11, 15 November 2011

CamCASP => Bugs => Errors in Second-order Energies

Background

Way back in 2010, while developing a potential for molecule XVI (part of the 2010 Blind test), we had encountered large errors in the second-order energies for dimers of this molecule. Sally had alerted us to this (she was developing the potential with my help). She had realised there was a problem as there were significant outliers in the total energies and dispersion energies when compared with our fits. Closer investigation revealed that the contributions to the dispersion energy at imaginary frequency were erratic, and in some cases, even changed sign (they should all be of one sign and decay as <math> 1/(w^2+w_0^2)</math>), where <math>w_0</math> is a characteristic frequency). At that point we brushed aside the problem as there wasn't time to investigate it. But we knew that it was related to the new propagator module that allows us to calculate the FDDS entirely within CamCASP using the ALDAX+CHF model.

Recently, I have encountered the problem yet again, this time with the pyridine dimer. As before, the calculations involve the new propagator module with the ALDAX+CHF model. Unfortunately, this seems to be a large-system problem. Calculations on smaller systems or large systems with smaller (less-diffuse) basis sets have not exhibited the problem. Nor has there been a problem with calculations using the ALDAX propagator.

Here I present a summary of my investigations with a few pyridine dimer systems.

Details

Unless stated, the calculations use the parameters defined here.

CamCASP:

 trunk  rev 22218
 

DALTON

 Version 2 with patches from Rafal. 
 Also includes changes suggested by Anthony to get it to compile with ifort. 
 See CamCASP/Compilation  for details.

Default run parameters:

 Integral switch = 1
 PBE0
 ALDAX+CHF
 Standard integration grids

Machines used:

 Tati:
    ifort Version 11.1
    BLAS/LAPACK: Goto2 
 mmp12:
    ifort Version 12.0.5
    BLAS/LAPACK: ATLAS 3.8.4 with LAPACK additions from Netlib
       Compiled with Gfortran 4.5 or 4.6 (probably 4.5)
    Gfortran: Versions 4.5.4 and 4.6.1

Example 1: Pyridine

Pyr2-double-Hbonded.png

Click here for a generic CLUSTER file


Sadlej/MC+/AC

mmp12:
     ALDA+CHF :  -1628.32   -2316.07
     ALDAX+CHF:  -1546.89   -2324.97
     ALDAX    :  -1460.61   -2065.68
    ---------------------------------
tati:
    Original run: PBE0/AC Integral switch = 0 ifort 11.1
    CamCASP: Compiled >= Aug 05 2011
             Rev. 22175
     ALDAX+CHF:  -311.77    -1138.50
    ---------------------------------

The results on Tati are clearly nonsense. Here are some details of that run:

DATADIR: CamCASP/tests/bugs/kernel-bugs/bug-1-aldx-chf/pyr2/pyr2-sadlej-mcP-original/

File: $DATADIR/OUT/pot1721-Min13-s0.95-aldax-chf.out

  INDUCTION CALCULATION

  Parameters same. Skipping DF for pyr_1
OV DF finished for pyr_1
 E^{2}_{ind}(UC) =     -1634.523269 CM-1
     E^{2}_{ind}(UC)(A) =      -817.260620 CM-1
     E^{2}_{ind}(UC)(B) =      -817.262648 CM-1
 E^{2}_{ind} =      -311.774657 CM-1
     E^{2}_{ind}(A) =      -194.440126 CM-1
     E^{2}_{ind}(B) =      -117.334532 CM-1
  Density-fitted propagator was used.
  Propagator type : cks
 ---------------------------------

 E^{2}_{ind,exch} =       207.525965 CM-1
     E^{2}_{ind,exch}(A) =       129.424747 CM-1
     E^{2}_{ind,exch}(B) =        78.101219 CM-1
 E^{2}_{ind,exch}(UC) =      1087.984745 CM-1
     E^{2}_{ind,exch}(UC)(A) =       543.991362 CM-1
     E^{2}_{ind,exch}(UC)(B) =       543.993383 CM-1
 ---------------------------------

 ---------------------------------
 Quad points and XI at each point:
 i     OMEGA             XI
 ---------------------------------
    1      0.006610   -0.903720E-02
    2      0.036175    0.100213E+00
    3      0.095447   -0.197757E-01
    4      0.197644   -0.154010E-01
    5      0.370417   -0.103565E-01
    6      0.674915   -0.495012E-02
    7      1.264899   -0.114417E-02
    8      2.619245   -0.200620E-03
    9      6.910886   -0.698310E-05
   10     37.823762   -0.109340E-07
 ---------------------------------
 E^{2}_{disp} =     -1138.500450 CM-1
 E^{2}_{disp}(UC) =     -3550.241639 CM-1
     Density-fitted propagator was used.
     Propagator type : cks
 ---------------------------------

 E^{2}_{disp,exch} =       180.486265 CM-1
 E^{2}_{disp,exch}(UC) =       562.819148 CM-1
 ---------------------------------