Difference between revisions of "CamCASP/Programming/7"
import>Am592 |
import>Am592 |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[CamCASP]] => [[CamCASP/Programming | Programming]] => Propagator |
[[CamCASP]] => [[CamCASP/Programming | Programming]] => Propagator |
||
+ | |||
+ | The new propagator module (in CamCASP 5.5-dev) can create the propagator in the LDAX approximation very efficiently. Construction scales as <math>O(N^4)</math>. Further, the kernel integrals are calculated with <math>O(N^3)</math> scaling (one power for grid points and two powers for auxiliary basis functions). So the new propagator can be calculated very efficiently. But the ALDAX approximation in the kernel results in significant errors in the polarizabilities and (probably dispersion energies). |
||
+ | |||
+ | As a temporary measure we could calculate the hybrid ADALX+CHF (not ALDA - I still don't have the VWN correlation functional programmed, but this is not a large error) by back transforming the kernel using the DF solution. So we go from a two-index object to a four-index object, then form the full propagator, and then transform back to a two-index density-fitted propagator. This is a round-about way, but should work and will still benefit from the efficiency gains in evaluating the kernel integrals. |
||
==Benzene== |
==Benzene== |
Revision as of 18:15, 20 April 2010
CamCASP => Programming => Propagator
The new propagator module (in CamCASP 5.5-dev) can create the propagator in the LDAX approximation very efficiently. Construction scales as <math>O(N^4)</math>. Further, the kernel integrals are calculated with <math>O(N^3)</math> scaling (one power for grid points and two powers for auxiliary basis functions). So the new propagator can be calculated very efficiently. But the ALDAX approximation in the kernel results in significant errors in the polarizabilities and (probably dispersion energies).
As a temporary measure we could calculate the hybrid ADALX+CHF (not ALDA - I still don't have the VWN correlation functional programmed, but this is not a large error) by back transforming the kernel using the DF solution. So we go from a two-index object to a four-index object, then form the full propagator, and then transform back to a two-index density-fitted propagator. This is a round-about way, but should work and will still benefit from the efficiency gains in evaluating the kernel integrals.
Benzene
- Basis: Sadlej
- Old timings obtained using different processor (AMD), so using pyridine/sadlej timings (note: smaller basis set!):
- DALTON: Kernel integrals: 3.3 hours
- CamCASP: (properties) 2.5 hours
- New timings (ALDAX kernel):
- Kernel: 6.5 minutes
- CamCASP (only total polarizabilities): 12 minutes
Not quite a good comparison, but you get the idea. The new propagator is very very fast.
Accuracy is poor. ALDA(X) is just not good enough for <math>\pi</math>-conjugated systems. Here are the dipole-dipole polarizabilities:
ALDA+CHF kernel:
43.247483 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 80.710408 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 80.713103 Isotropic polarizability: 68.22366473 Anisotropic polarizability: 37.46427266
ALDAX kernel:
Order: 1 by 1 39.035569 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 70.478442 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 70.487565 Isotropic polarizability: 60.00052553 Anisotropic polarizability: 31.44743535
That's a 12% error.