Difference between revisions of "Talk:Catherine Pitt"
import>Cen1001 |
import>Cen1001 |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Do you find you get a load of library not found errors? If so then this is probably the reason. I can always try to add the appropriate pieces to make Pathscale behave in to the library modules. --[[User:cen1001|Catherine]] 11:34, 25 March 2008 (GMT) |
Do you find you get a load of library not found errors? If so then this is probably the reason. I can always try to add the appropriate pieces to make Pathscale behave in to the library modules. --[[User:cen1001|Catherine]] 11:34, 25 March 2008 (GMT) |
||
| + | |||
| + | Yup, this does seem to make a big difference! I don't think there are any modules on the workstations that require this fix. The ACML on tardis was already fixed (this is where I found the note) and I've done the new FFTW module on tardis (won't go live until I unleash a whole set of changes to make tardis's modules more logical) --[[User:cen1001|Catherine]] 11:57, 25 March 2008 (GMT) |
||
Revision as of 11:57, 25 March 2008
pathscale -Ofast:
I had many problems getting pathscale to compile CPMD when using the -Ofast option (whereas it was easy if I used a lower level of optimisation) and so I had to give up. I wonder if this is why...--james 17:33, 20 March 2008 (GMT)
Do you find you get a load of library not found errors? If so then this is probably the reason. I can always try to add the appropriate pieces to make Pathscale behave in to the library modules. --Catherine 11:34, 25 March 2008 (GMT)
Yup, this does seem to make a big difference! I don't think there are any modules on the workstations that require this fix. The ACML on tardis was already fixed (this is where I found the note) and I've done the new FFTW module on tardis (won't go live until I unleash a whole set of changes to make tardis's modules more logical) --Catherine 11:57, 25 March 2008 (GMT)