Difference between revisions of "Lapack compilation"
import>Jss43 m |
import>Jss43 m |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
[reams of output] |
[reams of output] |
||
g77: ../../blas_LINUX.a: No such file or directory # FIBBERS! |
g77: ../../blas_LINUX.a: No such file or directory # FIBBERS! |
||
− | jss43@keiko:~/src/lib/lapack-3.1.1> cd BLAS/SRC && make && cd |
+ | jss43@keiko:~/src/lib/lapack-3.1.1> cd BLAS/SRC && make && cd - # Fine, we'll make BLAS ourselves... |
jss43@keiko:~/src/lib/lapack-3.1.1> make # ...and finish the job. |
jss43@keiko:~/src/lib/lapack-3.1.1> make # ...and finish the job. |
||
</pre> |
</pre> |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
Actually, not so straightfoward. I found using zdotc caused a segmentation fault. Some google-fu implied this might be due to how g77 and gfortran [http://developer.apple.com/hardwaredrivers/ve/errata.html return values from routines], and causes problems with 4 routines. Catherine, Greg: did you have this issue? |
Actually, not so straightfoward. I found using zdotc caused a segmentation fault. Some google-fu implied this might be due to how g77 and gfortran [http://developer.apple.com/hardwaredrivers/ve/errata.html return values from routines], and causes problems with 4 routines. Catherine, Greg: did you have this issue? |
||
− | Anyway, I re-compiled using the |
+ | Anyway, I re-compiled using the INSTALL/make.inc.gfortran as the make.inc. I had to do ''make cleanall'', which is different from ''make clean''. zdotc no longer caused any issues. |
+ | |||
+ | [[User:cen1001|Catherine]] 09:49, 7 July 2008 (BST) I haven't encountered that, but we gave up supporting ATLAS other than by providing the precompiled binaries about the time gfortran succeeded g77 and I haven't tried building it since, so I expect I'd get the same thing. |
Latest revision as of 19:52, 25 July 2008
I had some problems using the atlas modules, which seem to be not applicable to all machines (e.g. 64-bit P4s). I compiled my own lapack routines (available from [1]. Their documentation is wrong in certain places, but it's kind of obvious what paths they refer to. As Catherine notes, it's not worth doing much tuning, so I just used the bog-standard f77 configuration. I installed it in ~/src/lib/lapack-3.1.1:
jss43@keiko:~/src/lib> wget -O - http://www.netlib.org/lapack/lapack.tgz | tar xvzf - # Download and extract to lapack-3.1.1 jss43@keiko:~/src/lib> cd lapack-3.1.1 jss43@keiko:~/src/lib/lapack-3.1.1> cp make.inc.example make.inc # Use g77 configuration. Other examples exist in the INSTALL directory. jss43@keiko:~/src/lib/lapack-3.1.1> make # A (cursory) glance at the docs implies this makes everything (including BLAS). [reams of output] g77: ../../blas_LINUX.a: No such file or directory # FIBBERS! jss43@keiko:~/src/lib/lapack-3.1.1> cd BLAS/SRC && make && cd - # Fine, we'll make BLAS ourselves... jss43@keiko:~/src/lib/lapack-3.1.1> make # ...and finish the job.
The last make command takes a while to run, so it's worth having a cup of tea as you wait. (You can avoid the error in the middle by editing the Makefile.)
The makefile also runs tests which passed. The libraries are blas_LINUX.a and lapack_LINUX.a, so we can link to them to give them more standard names:
jss43@keiko:~/src/lib/lapack-3.1.1> ln -s lapack_LINUX.a liblapack.a jss43@keiko:~/src/lib/lapack-3.1.1> ln -s blas_LINUX.a libblas.a
These can now be used in compilation by using:
-L ~/src/lib/lapack-3.1.1 -llapack -lblas
in the link line. This is somewhat platform dependent though, so we can make it even easier to use by using enviroment modules to reduce the link line to:
-llapack -lblas
ADDENDUM: Actually, not so straightfoward. I found using zdotc caused a segmentation fault. Some google-fu implied this might be due to how g77 and gfortran return values from routines, and causes problems with 4 routines. Catherine, Greg: did you have this issue?
Anyway, I re-compiled using the INSTALL/make.inc.gfortran as the make.inc. I had to do make cleanall, which is different from make clean. zdotc no longer caused any issues.
Catherine 09:49, 7 July 2008 (BST) I haven't encountered that, but we gave up supporting ATLAS other than by providing the precompiled binaries about the time gfortran succeeded g77 and I haven't tried building it since, so I expect I'd get the same thing.